Top 15 Technical Skills Assessment Tools in 2025 | iMocha

According to a Gartner survey (Nov–Dec 2022), 86% of CIOs say they face increased competition for qualified candidates, and 73% worry about losing IT talent. Even with many layoffs, the demand for skilled tech workers remains strong. Recruiters and hiring managers now need to find, test, and hire good candidates quickly. 

Technical skills assessment tools can help. These tools make hiring easier by offering standard tests for specific roles. They help employers find real talent, reduce bias, and avoid poor hiring choices. With live coding challenges and AI-driven analytics, these tools help recruiters make better decisions and improve tech hiring quality. 

In this blog, we list the Top 15 Technical Skills Assessment Tools to help you choose the best one for your hiring needs in 2025 and later.

Top 15 Technical Skills Assessment Tools

1. iMocha

Founded in: 2015     

Founded by: Amit Mishra and Sujit Karpe

iMocha is a popular technical assessment tool with more than 3000 skill tests, covering over 30 programming languages, frameworks, and IT skills. It is designed for tech hiring and includes advanced features like AI-LogicBox, Code Replay, and live coding tests, making it easy to check developers in real situations.

iMocha also has video proctoring, plagiarism checking, and works well with popular ATS systems. This makes the hiring process secure and easy. Tests can be changed to match job roles, helping recruiters make fast hiring decisions based on data.

Pros:     

• iMocha has ready-to-use code tests with over 1000 coding questions and 500 IT skills that help cut the time to hire in half.  
• iMocha's advanced plagiarism detection technology allows hiring managers to spot unoriginal code.
• With image, video, and audio proctoring powered by A.I., this technical assessment tool enables you to detect cheating.

Cons:

• iMocha does not conduct psychometric tests. 

Clients: Deloitte, PayPal, Fujitsu, Capgemini, Cognizant, Wipro, CGI, and more      

Pricing: Visit iMocha's pricing page for more details.

G2 Rating: 4.4/5 (267 reviews)

2. CodilityFounded in: 2009

Founded by: Greg Jakacki

Free Trial: Yes

Pros:

• It can be deployed and is simpler for H.R. who don't know how to code. It's easier to assess a candidate’s abilities against those of other programmers.
• With the use of software, Codility assists you in creating a collection of code tasks that are suitable in terms of difficulty for the type of hire.
• Codility conducts monthly catchups by the account manager to resolve customers’ queries.

Cons:

• Having no debug pane (a tool to fix all software errors) makes testing more difficult for users.
• Codility doesn't have anti-cheating features like video monitoring or image proctoring, making it simple for users to copy and paste answers from other web pages into their Codility tests.

Clients: Unity, Zalando, Paypal, American Express, Intel

Pricing: Not mentioned publicly.

G2 Rating: 4.6/5 (408 reviews)

3. eSkill Founded in: 2003

Founded by: Gerrad Szatvanyi

Free Trial: Yes  

Pros:

• It's easy to create a test using eSkill's pre-loaded questions. To make a test more suitable for the current recruitment, it can be duplicated and then personalized as per the job role.  
• Their pre-made examinations cover practically everything, from general skills to job roles, with remarkable attention to detail.  
• The extensive library of evaluations that eSkill has is based on market and industry needs.  

Cons:

• There is no test model payment. It is not possible to buy test packages that are monthly or smaller. Every year, the full model, which is more than you need, must be acquired.  
• The confusing U.I. of the results platform makes navigation difficult.  

Clients: Coca-Cola, Work Personnel, State of Colorado, Emory University, Pandora

Pricing: Not mentioned publicly.

G2 Rating: 4.5/5 (329 reviews)

4. HackerRank

Founded in: 2012     

Founded by: Vivek Ravisankar and Hari Karunanidhi      

Free Trial: Yes

Pros:      

• HackerRank has strong plagiarism checks, which provide authentic results.     
• This technical evaluation tool often holds programming competitions, pushing programmers to do better each time and hone their technical abilities.  
• Subscribers of HackerRank have access to testing for over 95 technical jobs, 40 languages, and eight pre-built or bespoke frameworks.  

Cons:

• HackerRank lacks in both quantity and quality of questions. Nearly all of the sections have the same types of questions.  
• Unlike other technical assessment platforms, this hiring tool does not restrict the solution page.  

Clients: Badoo, Canva, Clumio, Dropbox, Enel

Pricing: Custom pricing 

G2 Rating: 4.7/5 (455 reviews)

5. MettlFounded in: July 2009    

Founded by: Tonmoy Shingal    

Free Trial: No  

Pros: 

• Each test is divided into many modules, allowing applicants to select the modules they wish to take and the ones they do not or to combine different modules into one.   
• Mettl makes it easier to understand and finalize profiles by making the competencies understandable through graphs and subjective data,  

Cons:

• Mettl doesn't provide any sort of AVG Score or excel reports for scores (local or global standard).  
• It has complex U.I. leading to wastage of time.  

Clients: Ghent University Global Campus, MakeMyTrip, Workforce, Gulf University, NASSCOM    

Pricing: $249/year  

G2 Rating: 4.4/5 (499 reviews)  

Founded in: 2014

Founded by: Tigran Sloyan, Aram Shatakhtsyan, and Felix Desroches

Free Trial: Yes

Pros:

• CodeSignal is ideal for practicing algorithm challenges as it has many daily problems categorized by categories. A different degree of badges is awarded for each challenge.
• The platform has straightforward U.I., so the user does not have to waste much time figuring out the features.
• You can access more than 70 languages, frameworks, and libraries through CodeSignal.

Cons:

• All front-end and back-end skills cannot be tested.
• A restricted number of sessions are provided each month.

Clients: Uber, Robinhood, Meta, Instacart, Zoom, Quora

Pricing: custom pricing

G2 Rating: 4.7/5 (689 reviews)

Founded in: 2012

Founded by: Sachin Gupta

Free Trial: Yes

Pros:

• The platform collaborates with multiple well-known organizations to host Hackathons so that the candidate can stay updated and competitive.  
• To assist candidates in career development, HackerEarth offers helpful tools, including leaderboards, forum discussions, and score analyses.  

Cons: 

• They don’t offer assessments on varying difficulty.  
• Due to indexing and prioritization flaws, navigating the kinds of problems you are attempting to solve is challenging.  
• Because the interview pipeline is unclear, it becomes uncertain to determine how far along the candidate was during the interviewing process. Additionally, human recruiter feedback can be delayed and occasionally end up in spam.  

Clients: Dunnhumby, Walmart, Intuit, Wells Fargo, Amazon

Pricing: $20/month

G2 Rating: 4.5/5 (309 reviews)

Founded in: 2019

Founded by: Wouter Durville and Otto Verhage

Free Trial: Yes

Pros:

• You can effortlessly follow a candidate's interview funnel with TestGorilla.
• Numerous useful skills are offered by TestGorilla, including mental aptitude, culture fit, and other fundamental abilities.
• TestGorilla balances assessment difficulty and, hence, finalizes only job-fit candidates.

Cons: 

• TestGorilla's virtual customer support is unresponsive.
• Video proctoring analysis is not available in TestGorilla.

Clients: Majorel, H&M, Public Groupe, Oracle, Bain & Company

Pricing: Pay-as-you-go model

G2 Rating: 4.5/5 (1023 reviews)

Founded in: 2013

Founded by: Vincent Woo  

Free Trial: Yes  

Pros:      

• Coderpad has an intuitive U.I.
• More than 30 programming languages and 60+ technologies and frameworks are supported by CoderPad.
• It also provides take-home assignments with an optional automatic scoring system for candidates farther down your funnel.

Cons:

• The two essential aspects of Coderpad that are lacking are keybinding and autocomplete for coding assessments.
• CoderPad does not provide take-home coding assessments.
• Since Coderpad doesn't support freehand drawings or pictures, it can be challenging to demonstrate specific concepts and issues.

Clients: Netflix, Shopify, Databricks, Slack, One Medical    

Pricing: $50/month  

G2 Rating: 4.4/5 (209 reviews)

Founded in: 2013

Founded by: Jakub Kubrynski

Free Trial: Yes

Pros:

• DevSkiller is a very adaptable online technical skills assessment tool. You can either customize your assessments or choose from the ready 4000 assessments.
• It aids the recruiter in making impartial recruiting decisions to create a diverse workforce.
• You can quickly identify a candidate's skill gaps with TalentBoost.

Cons:

• The candidates cannot manage their subscriptions and add-ons on Devskiller because the management panel is unavailable.
• DevSkiller is an expensive technical skills assessment tool.
• DevSkiller lacks integration with code-hosting platforms like GitHub, which makes it hard to deploy any changes in tests.

Clients: Jonah Group, IKEA Retail, TPAY, Mindera, ADA

Pricing: $499-$999/month

G2 Rating: 4.7/5 (60 reviews)

Founded in: 2015

Founded by: Abhishek Kaushik

Free Trial: Yes

Pros

• WeCP has a pre-built and customizable library with 2000+ tests for developer skills.
• It has a timely reporting system and an automatic follow-up process.
• The customer service of this technical skills assessment tool is of great help.

Cons:

• The quality of the personalized questions is mediocre.
• The complex U.I. of this assessment tool is not understandable to all.
• The automated grading function is ineffective.

Clients: Infosys, Texas Instruments, Adobe, Bosch, Great Learning

G2 Rating: 4.8/5 (83 reviews)

Pricing: Not available publicly.

Founded in: 2012     

Founded by: Daniel Borowski     

Free Trial: Yes  

Pros:    

• CoderByte invitations allow you to send a public link and a private invitation to a colleague or friend.
• Only after a thorough study is all assessments reversed, assisting candidates in improving their performance each time.
• CoderByte provides multiple-choice questions, challenges, and open-ended inquiries in more than 30 languages and skill levels.

Cons:

• The problems cannot be filtered in any manner using this online coding interview tool, including success rate, complexity, time, candidate count, etc. This deficiency causes the failure of candidates from various backgrounds.
• There aren't many difficulties in programming at the moment.
• CoderByte does not allow customizing tests.

Clients: Cisco, Samsung, Mastercard, Morning Brew, Typeform, Gigster

Pricing: $199/month

G2 Rating: 4.5/5 (327 reviews)

13. HirePro

Founded in: 2003

Founded by: Anshuman Das and Rishi Das

Free Trial: Yes

Pros:

• At HirePro you can continue using your current ATS by integrating it with the software.
• It allows you to customize your approval procedure to meet your company's demands.

Cons:

• The price of this technical assessment platform is higher than others in the market.

Clients: DE Shaw & Co, ALSTOM, ANZ, Allstate, Medtronic

Pricing: On Request

G2 Rating: 4.3/5 (2 reviews)

Founded in: 2017  

Founded by: Wes Winham Winler  

Free Trial: Yes  

Pros:

• Woven offers you mock evaluations and detailed feedback to keep the candidate’s learning process up to date.  
• It provides insightful and thorough real-person evaluations for each assessment.
• Woven's layout is simple, intuitive, and adaptable and includes all the necessary information, including functional code, test code, problem descriptions, and output console.  

Cons:

• Throughout the tests, there is no built-in timer.  
• The solution pages are more complicated than the problems.  

Clients: Bestow, Olive, Greenlight Guru, 15five.

Pricing: $11500/feature

G2 Rating: 4.7/5 (522 reviews)

Founded in: 2019  

Founded by: Tracy Phillips  

Free Trial: Yes  

Pros:  

• A large library of instantly usable, customizable questions is provided in CodeSubmit.  
• This hiring tool offers code pair sessions, take-home tests, and screening challenges in one interface.  
• It enables the applicant to create a unique grading scale for every work that all hiring supervisors can use.  

Cons:

• This technical skills assessment tool lacks ATS integration (Applicant Tracking System).
• Customizable email templates are not available in CodeSubmit.  

Clients: Klari, Konux

Pricing: $79/month (per user)

G2 Rating: 4.9/5 (11 reviews)

Closing Thoughts

In an industry where hiring good tech talent quickly is important for business success, iMocha helps you do that. It has coding challenges you can change, questions powered by AI, real-time skill tests, and safe tests to stop cheating. iMocha makes sure you don't just fill jobs, but hire the right people from the start. 

If you are testing new graduates or senior developers, iMocha gives you secure tests that work for different hiring needs. It helps make tech hiring faster and simpler and can cut your hiring time by half.

FAQs

What is a technical assessment tool?

A technical assessment tool identifies and evaluates the technical abilities of programmers, such as product knowledge, technical maturity, and programming status. The best technical assessment platform available in the market, like iMocha, enables the recruiter to quantify technical skills and make a data-driven hiring decision.

How do technical skills assessment tools work?

Technical assessment tools test a candidate’s skills through coding tasks, multiple-choice questions, simulations, or projects. These tools usually include timers, coding environments, and proctoring tools to prevent cheating and provide clear reports to recruiters.

What skills can be tested using technical assessment tools?

You can test many skills, including programming (e.g., Python, Java, JavaScript), front-end and back-end development, DevOps, data science, AI/ML, cloud technologies (AWS, Azure), database management, cybersecurity, system design, QA testing, and more.

How can cheating be prevented in online technical assessments?

Cheating can be prevented by:

• I.D. Verification to ensure the candidate taking the assessment is the intended one
• Prepare higher-order thinking questions
• Add a time limit to the questions
• Disable Copy-Paste Option
• Enable audio, video, and image proctoring
• Set Window lock with test termination