Market research evaluates and segments the worldwide developer population at 24.5 million. This number is estimated to reach 28.7 million in the upcoming years. Moreover, with the great migration, there is no dearth of candidates, but finding the right ones for you can still be an uphill task.
There are various reasons for it, but some of the crucial ones are:
So, in this challenging environment, recruiters and hiring managers have to rely on developer assessment tools to get a complete report of each candidate’s skills. They not only delineate strengths and weaknesses but also how your candidates will fare on the job.
And to make the process of selecting this software easier for you, we’ve created this comprehensive list of developer assessment tools, replete with their pros and cons, pricing, and more, so you can make an informed decision.
Note: All the pros and cons included in the listicle are taken from verified sources like G2 and Capterra.
Table of content |
1. iMocha
Founded by: Amit Mishra and Sujit Karpe
Type of assessments: Coding assessments, coding simulators, project-based assessments, role-specific skills, cognitive ability, communication skills, analytical and technical evaluations.
iMocha is a remote coding interview tool that provides many candidate-friendly features such as default code stubs, IntelliSense, and test cases to help coders focus more on algorithms to tackle coding issues. In addition, CodeReplay allows reviewers to play back line-by-line screenshots of a candidate's code.
They offer various coding assessment measures, such as Live Coding Interviews – where a panel of interviewers can view live as a candidate writes code, Whiteboarding – which allows a candidate a real coding environment with compilation features, and more.
Expanding its innovative skill assessment suite of software, iMocha launched the Skills Intelligence Cloud in 2023. This platform is a comprehensive AI and Cloud-native solution empowering talent managers to recruit, upskill, or reskill and encourage internal mobility across various industries. It facilitates precise evaluation of employees' existing skills and pinpoints areas for enhancement, building a thorough skill inventory alongside other valuable capabilities.
Pros:
Cons:
Clients: Deloitte, PayPal, Fujitsu, Capgemini, Cognizant, Wipro, CGI
G2 Crowd Rating: 4.4/5 (247 reviews)
Pricing: Available on request
Best suited for: Enterprises, SMEs, Medium to large corporations, and start-ups
2. CoderPad
Founded by: Vincent Woo
Type of assessments: Technical assessments, gamified assessments, role-specific assessments, test wizards
Pros:
Cons:
Clients: Netflix, Shopify, Databricks, Slack, One Medical
G2 Crowd Rating: 4.4/5 (210 reviews)
Pricing: It varies on the size of the corporation., e.g., It costs $1500/month for large enterprises.
Best suited for: Technical recruiter, significant enterprises.
3.CodinGame
Founded by: Aude Barral
Type of assessments: Technical assessment, role-specific assessment, gamified assessment.
Pros:
Cons:
Clients: Witekio, Mano Mano, Meritis, Dassault Systemes, Nasdaq
G2 Crowd Rating: 4.8/5 (27 reviews)
Pricing: $249-$349/month
Best suited for: Enterprises
4. HackerRank
Founded by: Vivek Ravisankar and Hari Karunanidhi
Type of assessments: Role-specific assessment, aptitude, cognitive abilities, technical.
Pros:
Cons:
Clients: Badoo, Canva, Clumio, Dropbox, Enel
G2 Crowd Rating: 4.5/5 (376 reviews)
Pricing: Custom pricing
Best suited for: Medium to Large enterprises
HackerRank or iMocha, which one to choose? Know here.
5. CoderByte
Founded in: 2012
Founded by: Daniel Borowski
Type of assessments: Technical Assessment; screening, interviews, role-specific assessment
Pros:
Cons:
Clients: Cisco, Samsung, Mastercard, Morning Brew, Typeform, Gigster
G2 Crowd Rating: 4.4/5 (330 reviews)
Pricing: $199/month
Best suited for: Start-ups to Large enterprises
6. Filtered
Founded by: Paul Bilodeau and Jill Huang
Type of assessments: Technical assessment, SQL assessment
Pros:
Cons:
Clients: Regus, AAT, The Institute of Chartered Accountants. FHLB Chicago, WAHL, HgCapital
G2 Crowd Rating: 4.9/5 (16 reviews)
Pricing: Custom prices
Best suited for: Small to Medium enterprises
7. CodeInterview
Founded by: Munir Usman
Type of assessments: Technical assessment, screening, interviews, and projects.
Pros:
Cons:
Clients: Redisblabs, Joist, BostonDynamics, Instabridge, Workday
G2 Crowd Rating: 4.5/5 (52 reviews)
Pricing: "Pay as you go" model. The business can pay for each conducted interview.
Best suited for: Individuals and small companies
8. CodeSignal
Founded by: Tigran Sloyan, Aram Shatakhtsyan, and Felix Desroches.
Type of assessments: Personality, cognitive ability, technical skills.
Pros:
Cons:
Clients: Uber, Robinhood, Meta, Instacart, Zoom, Quora
G2 Crowd Rating: 4.5/5 (693 reviews)
Pricing: custom pricing
Best suited for: Medium to large corporations
9. Codility
Founded by: Greg Jakacki
Type of assessments: Role-specific assessment, aptitude, cognitive abilities, technical.
Pros:
Cons:
Clients: Unity, Zalando, Paypal, American Express, Intel
G2 Crowd Rating: 4.6/5 (409 reviews)
Pricing: Not mentioned publicly.
Best suited for: Enterprises
10. DevSkiller
Founded by: Jakub Kubrynski
Type of assessments: Role-specific tests, IQ tests, personality tests, drug tests, basic literacy tests, aptitude tests, integrity tests, cognitive ability tests, physical ability tests, and background check tests.
Pros:
Cons:
Clients: Jonah Group, IKEA Retail, TPAY, Mindera, ADA
G2 Crowd Rating: 4.8/5 (61 reviews)
Pricing: $499-$999/month
Best suited for: medium to large corporations and technical recruiters.
Also read: Top 20 interview tools for employers
Tools |
Key Features |
G2 Rating (Reviews) |
Pricing |
iMocha |
Coding assessments, project-based tests, Automated Video Interviews, Live Coding Interview, |
4.4/5 (247 reviews) |
|
CoderPad |
Technical assessments, gamified assessments, role-specific assessments, take-home assignments |
4.4/5 (210 reviews) |
~$1500/month |
CodinGame |
Technical and gamified assessments, predefined roles, 60+ technologies |
4.8/5 (27 reviews) |
$249-$349/month |
HackerRank |
Role-specific, cognitive abilities, technical tests, coding contests |
4.5/5 (376 reviews) |
Custom pricing |
CoderByte |
Technical screening, interviews, role-specific, and multiple-choice questions |
4.4/5 (330 reviews) |
$199/month |
Filtered |
Technical and SQL assessments, live video interface, professional verification |
4.9/5 (16 reviews) |
Custom pricing |
CodeInterview |
Technical screening, projects, templates, whiteboards |
4.5/5 (52 reviews) |
Pay-per-interview |
CodeSignal |
Personality, cognitive ability, technical skills, 70+ languages, Monaco-powered IDE |
4.5/5 (693 reviews) |
Custom pricing |
Codility |
Role-specific, aptitude, cognitive, and technical assessments |
4.6/5 (409 reviews) |
Custom pricing |
DevSkiller |
Role-specific, cognitive ability, background checks, customizable tests |
4.8/5 (61 reviews) |
$499-$999/month |
FAQs
How do I conduct a coding interview online?
Follow the steps to conduct a coding interview online:
Which platform is best for coding interviews?
The best platform for coding interviews should be flexible and customizable as per the requirement of the job role. There are many coding interview platforms present in the market today which are efficiently fulfilling employers' requirements, one of them being iMocha.
iMocha has 2500+ skills including 500+ IT skills, 20+ coding languages, 50+ Next-Gen skills, etc. Find out more about iMocha’s vast skill library here.
Why is coding assessment critical?
Coding tests are one of the most acceptable ways to evaluate a candidate's technical abilities. When recruiters assess job-relevant skills using MCQs and simulators alongside knowledge-based methodologies, their job-relevant talent pool becomes much more manageable.
Can a candidate's skills be assessed using a software developer assessment tool?
It is possible to assess a candidate's skills using a software developer assessment tool.
The purpose of a coding exam is to quickly exclude applicants who lack the necessary technical skills for the position. It saves hiring managers and applicants time and effort.