Build Winning Teams with iMocha

Top 10 Coding Interview Tools to consider in 2024

Read More

Company News, Diversity & Inclusion, iMocha Engineering Product Updates Remote Hiring Skills Assessment

All Posts
13 September, 2022

Market research evaluates and segments the worldwide developer population at 24.5 million. This number is estimated to reach 28.7 million in the upcoming years. Moreover, with the great migration, there is no dearth of candidates, but finding the right ones for you can still be an uphill task.

There are various reasons for it, but some of the crucial ones are:

  • Lack of formal education while hiring for niche skills – for various skills like Ruby, NumPy, AWS, etc. there is no formal education, and recruiters often have to rely on resumes
  • Lack of focus on soft skills – for technical roles, often, recruiters forgo soft skills assessment
  • Competing offers – developers are in great demand, and they often have competing offers from various organizations, leading to stiff competition

So, in this challenging environment, recruiters and hiring managers have to rely on developer assessment tools to get a complete report of each candidate’s skills. They not only delineate strengths and weaknesses but also how your candidates will fare on the job.

And to make the process of selecting this software easier for you, we’ve created this comprehensive list of developer assessment tools, replete with their pros and cons, pricing, and more, so you can make an informed decision.

Note: All the pros and cons included in the listicle are taken from verified sources like G2 and Capterra.

 

 

Top 10 Coding Interview Tools

1. iMocha

iMochaFounded in: 2015

Founded by: Amit Mishra and Sujit Karpe

Type of assessments: Coding assessments, coding simulators, project-based assessments, role-specific skills, cognitive ability, communication skills, analytical and technical evaluations.

iMocha is a remote coding interview tool that provides many candidate-friendly features such as default code stubs, IntelliSense, and test cases to help coders focus more on algorithms to tackle coding issues. In addition, CodeReplay allows reviewers to play back line-by-line screenshots of a candidate's code.

They offer various coding assessment measures, such as Live Coding Interviews – where a panel of interviewers can view live as a candidate writes code, Whiteboarding – which allows a candidate a real coding environment with compilation features, and more.

Expanding its innovative skill assessment suite of software, iMocha launched the Skills Intelligence Cloud in 2023. This platform is a comprehensive AI and Cloud-native solution empowering talent managers to recruit, upskill, or reskill and encourage internal mobility across various industries. It facilitates precise evaluation of employees' existing skills and pinpoints areas for enhancement, building a thorough skill inventory alongside other valuable capabilities.

Pros:

  • AI-LogicBox, a patented product, works as a compiler for languages whose online compilers are not available.
  • iMocha library has 27 coding languages, with over 500+ IT skills tests and 1000+ coding question
  • iMocha offers advanced coding tests with features like code simulators, LogicBox questions, and live coding interviews, making assessments more interactive and candidate friendly.

Cons:

  • iMocha does not offer psychometric tests.

Clients: Deloitte, PayPal, Fujitsu, Capgemini, Cognizant, Wipro, CGI

G2 Crowd Rating: 4.4/5 (247 reviews)

Pricing: Available on request

Best suited for: Enterprises, SMEs, Medium to large corporations, and start-ups

 

 

Struggling to identify the right talent for your organization? Try iMocha's AI-powered coding assessments

 

 

2. CoderPad

CoderPadFounded in: 2013

Founded by: Vincent Woo

Type of assessments: Technical assessments, gamified assessments, role-specific assessments, test wizards

Pros:

  • CoderPad is a handy online coding interview tool. It organizes coding competitions among candidates to enhance their performance, making them ready for job roles.
  • CoderPad supports over 30 programming languages and more than 60 technologies and frameworks.
  • Additionally, it offers take-home assignments with an optional automatic scoring system for applicants farther down your funnel.

Cons:

  • Keybinding and autocomplete features are the two main areas where Coderpad is lacking.
  • The UI of CoderPad is often hard to understand by candidates.
  • It's hard to illustrate specific concepts and problems with Coderpad since it doesn't support freehand drawings or illustrations.

Clients: Netflix, Shopify, Databricks, Slack, One Medical

G2 Crowd Rating: 4.4/5 (210 reviews)

Pricing: It varies on the size of the corporation., e.g., It costs $1500/month for large enterprises.

Best suited for: Technical recruiter, significant enterprises.

 

3.CodinGame

CodinGameFounded in: 2012

Founded by: Aude Barral

Type of assessments: Technical assessment, role-specific assessment, gamified assessment.

Pros:

  • CodinGame technical assessment tests are gamified, which helps candidates reduce test anxiety.
  • Over 3,500 code tasks are available with CodinGame, and they test more than 60 technologies and frameworks.
  • With over 80 predefined job roles, CodinGame covers front-end, back-end, and full-stack expertise at various levels of seniority.

Cons:

  • CodinGame does not prevent cheating. Many participants often copy and paste codes written by other CodinGamers.
  • First-time coders may have difficulty understanding how the software works since there are no tutorials to understand UI.
  • Most languages lack optimization flags for compilation.

Clients: Witekio, Mano Mano, Meritis, Dassault Systemes, Nasdaq

G2 Crowd Rating: 4.8/5 (27 reviews)

Pricing: $249-$349/month

Best suited for: Enterprises

 

4. HackerRank

HackerRankFounded in: 2012

Founded by: Vivek Ravisankar and Hari Karunanidhi

Type of assessments: Role-specific assessment, aptitude, cognitive abilities, technical.

Pros:

  • HackerRank conducts coding contest, which helps recruiters in finding the best candidate for their organizations.
  • They have plagiarism checks, offering authentic results.
  • HackerRank subscribers can undergo testing in over 95 technical positions, 40 languages, and eight frameworks that are either custom-built or pre-built.

Cons:

  • HackerRank needs to improve the number and scope of questions as almost all sections have the same old questions.
  • Unlike other virtual coding interview platforms, HackerRank does not restrict candidates’ ability to look at the solution page.
  • The UI of HackerRank is complicated, making it hard to track personal growth and other milestones.

Clients: Badoo, Canva, Clumio, Dropbox, Enel

G2 Crowd Rating: 4.5/5 (376 reviews)

Pricing: Custom pricing

Best suited for: Medium to Large enterprises

 

HackerRank or iMocha, which one to choose? Know here.

 

5. CoderByte

Coderbyte

Founded in: 2012

Founded by: Daniel Borowski

Type of assessments: Technical Assessment; screening, interviews, role-specific assessment

Pros:

  • CoderByte invitations can be sent privately (with a personalized message) or publicly – which means anyone with the link can appear for the assessment
  • All assessments are reverted only after an in-depth analysis, helping recruiters and hiring managers to make informed decisions.
  • With more than 30 languages and skill sets, CoderByte offers multiple-choice questions, challenges, and open-ended inquiries.

Cons:

  • This online coding interview software does not provide the ability to filter the challenges in any way, such as success rate, difficulty, time, number of candidates, etc.
  • Only a limited number of programming challenges are present.
  • CoderByte does not allow customized tests.

Clients: Cisco, Samsung, Mastercard, Morning Brew, Typeform, Gigster

G2 Crowd Rating: 4.4/5 (330 reviews)

Pricing: $199/month

Best suited for: Start-ups to Large enterprises

 

 

Do you want to choose the best interactive coding interview tool for your organization? Let our expert help you out there.

 

 

6. Filtered

FilteredFounded in: 2016

Founded by: Paul Bilodeau and Jill Huang

Type of assessments: Technical assessment, SQL assessment

Pros:

  • Filtered offers verification through professional profiles on websites like LinkedIn, Gitlab, Bitbucket, or Facebook so you can be sure the candidate appearing for the test is a legitimate applicant.
  • At Filtered, you can access live video and a technical interviewing interface.
  • The starter bundle is free for all organizations.

Cons:

  • Each test can be attempted only once and no further.
  • Every evaluation is based on the organization's demands, and it can be challenging to locate formulas or blueprints.

Clients: Regus, AAT, The Institute of Chartered Accountants. FHLB Chicago, WAHL, HgCapital

G2 Crowd Rating: 4.9/5 (16 reviews)

Pricing: Custom prices

Best suited for: Small to Medium enterprises

 

 

7. CodeInterview

CodeInterviewFounded in: 2013

Founded by: Munir Usman

Type of assessments: Technical assessment, screening, interviews, and projects.    

Pros:

  • CodeInterview is a coding interview platform that is highly flexible and customizable. You can create templates for preplanned questions, use whiteboards for quick visual brainstorming, etc.
  • It offers 300+ challenges and tests to prepare candidates for coding interviews.
  • The capability of CodeInterview to build a database sample allows candidates to validate the queries they make during the interview, which is the most helpful feature.

Cons:

  • CoderByte has a complex dashboard due to which many candidates feel hesitant to use various features.
  • Whiteboards are not included in playbacks, and there is no way to identify the editor of a specific line of code.

Clients: Redisblabs, Joist, BostonDynamics, Instabridge, Workday

G2 Crowd Rating: 4.5/5 (52 reviews)

Pricing: "Pay as you go" model. The business can pay for each conducted interview. 

Best suited for: Individuals and small companies

 

 

8. CodeSignal

codesignalFounded in: 2014

Founded by: Tigran Sloyan, Aram Shatakhtsyan, and Felix Desroches.

Type of assessments: Personality, cognitive ability, technical skills.

Pros:

  • CodeSignal provides a Monaco-powered integrated development environment with autocomplete, syntax highlighting, and inline documentation.
  • This coding interview tool gives you access to assessments in 70+ languages, frameworks, and libraries.
  • It has a virtual whiteboard that helps you create visual ideas and drawings.

Cons:

  • It is impossible to test all front-end and back-end skills.
  • Only a few sessions are offered each month.

Clients: Uber, Robinhood, Meta, Instacart, Zoom, Quora

G2 Crowd Rating: 4.5/5 (693 reviews)

Pricing: custom pricing

Best suited for: Medium to large corporations

 

 

9. Codility

CodilityFounded in: 2009

Founded by: Greg Jakacki

Type of assessments: Role-specific assessment, aptitude, cognitive abilities, technical.

Pros:

  • The Codility HR team uses CodeLive to perform virtual whiteboard interviews.
  • On job boards, they conduct online coding challenges. Using this excellent interview code editor, you can simultaneously assess a candidate's skills during a live interview.

Cons:

  • The level of pre-existing tasks in the Codility dashboard is time-consuming. Along with the strict evaluation process, these pre-existing tasks can scare off eligible candidates.
  • Codility's library lacks technological assessments.

Clients: Unity, Zalando, Paypal, American Express, Intel

G2 Crowd Rating: 4.6/5 (409 reviews)

Pricing: Not mentioned publicly.

Best suited for: Enterprises

 

 

10. DevSkiller

DevSkillerFounded in: 2013

Founded by: Jakub Kubrynski

Type of assessments: Role-specific tests, IQ  tests, personality tests, drug tests, basic literacy tests, aptitude tests, integrity tests, cognitive ability tests, physical ability tests, and background check tests.

Pros:

  • DevSkiller is a highly customizable online coding interview tool. You can pick among 4,000 assignments and tailor the skills to examine the candidate for a job-specific.
  • It helps the recruiter to make objective hiring selections to build a diverse staff.   
  • With TalentBoost, you can easily detect skill shortages in the candidate.

Cons:

  • No management panel is available on Devskiller for the candidates to manage the subscriptions and add-ons.
  • Devskiller is an expensive developer assessment tool.
  • Custom code tests require zip files to be submitted, while integrating with code-hosting services like GitHub would make it easier to deploy and update tests.

Clients: Jonah Group, IKEA Retail, TPAY, Mindera, ADA

G2 Crowd Rating: 4.8/5 (61 reviews)

Pricing: $499-$999/month

Best suited for: medium to large corporations and technical recruiters.

Also read: Top 20 interview tools for employers

 

Features Comparison

Tools

Key Features

G2 Rating (Reviews)

Pricing

iMocha 

Coding assessments, project-based tests, Automated Video Interviews, Live Coding Interview,
and technical skills

4.4/5 (247 reviews) 

Available on request

CoderPad 

Technical assessments, gamified assessments, role-specific assessments, take-home assignments 

4.4/5 (210 reviews) 

~$1500/month 

CodinGame 

Technical and gamified assessments, predefined roles, 60+ technologies 

4.8/5 (27 reviews) 

$249-$349/month 

HackerRank 

Role-specific, cognitive abilities, technical tests, coding contests 

4.5/5 (376 reviews) 

Custom pricing 

CoderByte 

Technical screening, interviews, role-specific, and multiple-choice questions 

4.4/5 (330 reviews) 

$199/month 

Filtered 

Technical and SQL assessments, live video interface, professional verification 

4.9/5 (16 reviews) 

Custom pricing 

CodeInterview 

Technical screening, projects, templates, whiteboards 

4.5/5 (52 reviews) 

Pay-per-interview 

CodeSignal 

Personality, cognitive ability, technical skills, 70+ languages, Monaco-powered IDE 

4.5/5 (693 reviews) 

Custom pricing 

Codility 

Role-specific, aptitude, cognitive, and technical assessments 

4.6/5 (409 reviews) 

Custom pricing 

DevSkiller 

Role-specific, cognitive ability, background checks, customizable tests 

4.8/5 (61 reviews) 

$499-$999/month 

 

Wondering how to create coding assessments for junior, senior, and niche roles using one platform? Try iMocha!

 

 

FAQs

How do I conduct a coding interview online?

Follow the steps to conduct a coding interview online:

  • Buy a subscription to the best online remote coding interview tool, such as iMocha.
  • Provide the candidate with a shared code editor that includes syntax highlighting.
  • Do not pressure the candidate. Let them complete the assessment in a reasonable time.
  • Evaluate the assessment carefully.
  • Make decisions depending on the assessment test score. The employer should thoroughly discuss the evaluation to pinpoint the shortcomings and appreciate the accomplishments.

Which platform is best for coding interviews?

The best platform for coding interviews should be flexible and customizable as per the requirement of the job role. There are many coding interview platforms present in the market today which are efficiently fulfilling employers' requirements, one of them being iMocha.

iMocha has 2500+ skills including 500+ IT skills, 20+ coding languages, 50+ Next-Gen skills, etc. Find out more about iMocha’s vast skill library here.

 

Why is coding assessment critical?

Coding tests are one of the most acceptable ways to evaluate a candidate's technical abilities. When recruiters assess job-relevant skills using MCQs and simulators alongside knowledge-based methodologies, their job-relevant talent pool becomes much more manageable.

 

Can a candidate's skills be assessed using a software developer assessment tool?    

It is possible to assess a candidate's skills using a software developer assessment tool.

The purpose of a coding exam is to quickly exclude applicants who lack the necessary technical skills for the position. It saves hiring managers and applicants time and effort.

 

Technical assessments? Check! One-way video interviews? Check! Live Coding Interview? Check! Whiteboard assessments? Check! Custom assessments for your open job roles? Check! iMocha offers all!

 

 

Payal Rajpoot
Payal Rajpoot
Payal Rajpoot is an experienced and extremely versatile SEO Content Writer at iMocha. Her extensive experience in the field comes from working with six different organizations and numerous national and international clients as a freelancer. She adapts easily to market demands to produce, create and manage content for SaaS B2B to B2C. Her content has helped organizations mark visible changes in website ranking. She has a unique predilection for food, books, and vision board, so she spends her leisure time discovering new recipes, binge-reading books, and creating enchanting mood boards.
Find me on:

Topics: Tech Recruitment

Related Posts

Top 8 High Volume Hiring Strategies to Attract Quality Talent

What is the secret behind companies successfully recruiting in large numbers? Many industries face this challenge, especially when filling numerous positions quickly. This could be due to forming a new team, assembling skilled freelancers for a one-off project, or restructuring the entire organization after a merger or acquisition.

10 Best Plum Competitors & Alternatives

In the evolving field of talent management, Plum has established itself as an active player with its solutions to change how organizations and individuals see themselves professionally. Its two primary platforms - PlumThrive and PlumFlourish, serve different but related purposes. PlumThrive enables businesses to use scientific-based data driven analytics to enhance hiring accuracy and increase talent retention. PlumFlourish focuses on individuals, helping them align their skills with career opportunities to maximize their potential.

Top 8 Talent Acquisition Metrics to Track

The job market is influenced by rapid technological advancements, workforce diversity, and the need for businesses to adapt. These dynamics necessitate the implementation of accurate strategies for sourcing top talent.