Top 15 Technical Skills Assessment Tools in 2024

According to the latest Indeed research, recruiting technical talent is challenging for 86% of employers, while 36% claim it to be ‘extremely’ challenging.

With the increasing competition in the market, employers are desperately looking for ways to revamp traditional hiring methods, and hence adapting technical assessment tools are the way to do it.

During talent searches, organizations are continually looking for techniques to evaluate technical talents. Consequently, the concept of technical assessment tools has been introduced in the market. Hiring is no longer restricted to conventional methods now. You can source, screen, and interview the candidate in an automated, creative, more efficient, and reliable way.

Technical skill assessment tools help in hiring by providing objective and standardized evaluations of candidates' abilities. These tools can assess candidates' proficiency in specific technical skills, such as coding, data analysis, or engineering, helping recruiters and hiring managers make informed decisions. By using these tools, organizations can ensure that they are hiring candidates with the right technical expertise, reducing the risk of hiring mistakes and improving the overall quality of their workforce.

We have curated the list of the top 15 technical skills assessment tools in the market today. The list delineates their pros and cons, their pricing structure, their USPs, and more, to ensure you make the most informed decision.

Top 15 Technical Skills Assessment Tools

1. iMocha

With the largest skill library in the world with over 2500+ assessments, iMocha helps enterprises to make evaluated and data-backed hiring decisions. iMocha is every tech recruiter’s first choice to measure the competency of prospective tech professionals in technical skills such as programming, web development, machine learning, etc.   

iMocha offers a wide gamut of technical skills assessment offerings like patented AI-LogicBox, Code Replay, Coding Simulators, Automated interviews, and more. Its library is replete with all domain and technical skills assessments, which you can use as it is or customize according to your job role; it offers assessments for over 27 coding languages. In addition, technical skills assessments can be conducted in a real programming environment using iMocha's live coding interview feature. It has real-time video and chats features, where the interviewer can also offer code recommendations to increase coding effectiveness.

iMocha expanded beyond technical skills assessments with its 2023 launch of Skill Intelligence Cloud. This platform utilizes AI for employee skill gap analysis, enriching L&D strategies by providing deep insights into upskilling and reskilling. It also supports dynamic team creation, internal mobility, and enhances overall workforce readiness.   

Founded in: 2015     

Founded by: Amit Mishra and Sujit Karpe

Website: https://www.imocha.io

Free Trial: Yes

Pros:     

• iMocha has ready-to-use code tests with over 1000 coding questions and 500 IT skills that help cut the time to hire in half.  
• iMocha's advanced plagiarism detection technology allows hiring managers to spot unoriginal code.
• With image, video, and audio proctoring powered by A.I., this technical assessment tool enables you to detect cheating.

Cons:

• iMocha does not conduct psychometric tests. 

Clients: Deloitte, PayPal, Fujitsu, Capgemini, Cognizant, Wipro, CGI, and more      

Pricing: Visit iMocha’s pricing page here  

G2 Rating: 4.4/5 (239 reviews)

2. CodilityFounded in: 2009

Founded by: Greg Jakacki

Free Trial: Yes

Pros:

• It can be deployed and is simpler for H.R. who don't know how to code. It's easier to assess a candidate’s abilities against those of other programmers.
• With the use of software, Codility assists you in creating a collection of code tasks that are suitable in terms of difficulty for the type of hire.
• Codility conducts monthly catchups by the account manager to resolve customers’ queries.

Cons:

• Having no debug pane (a tool to fix all software errors) makes testing more difficult for users.
• Codility doesn't have anti-cheating features like video monitoring or image proctoring, making it simple for users to copy and paste answers from other web pages into their Codility tests.

Clients: Unity, Zalando, Paypal, American Express, Intel

Pricing: Not mentioned publicly.

G2 Rating: 4.6/5 (408 reviews)

3. eSkill Founded in: 2003

Founded by: Gerrad Szatvanyi

Free Trial: Yes  

Pros:

• It's easy to create a test using eSkill's pre-loaded questions. To make a test more suitable for the current recruitment, it can be duplicated and then personalized as per the job role.  
• Their pre-made examinations cover practically everything, from general skills to job roles, with remarkable attention to detail.  
• The extensive library of evaluations that eSkill has is based on market and industry needs.  

Cons:

• There is no test model payment. It is not possible to buy test packages that are monthly or smaller. Every year, the full model, which is more than you need, must be acquired.  
• The confusing U.I. of the results platform makes navigation difficult.  

Clients: Coca-Cola, Work Personnel, State of Colorado, Emory University, Pandora

Pricing: Not mentioned publicly.

G2 Rating: 4.5/5 (329 reviews)

4. HackerRank

Founded in: 2012     

Founded by: Vivek Ravisankar and Hari Karunanidhi      

Free Trial: Yes

Pros:      

• HackerRank has strong plagiarism checks, which provide authentic results.     
• This technical evaluation tool often holds programming competitions, pushing programmers to do better each time and hone their technical abilities.  
• Subscribers of HackerRank have access to testing for over 95 technical jobs, 40 languages, and eight pre-built or bespoke frameworks.  

Cons:

• HackerRank lacks in both quantity and quality of questions. Nearly all of the sections have the same types of questions.  
• Unlike other technical assessment platforms, this hiring tool does not restrict the solution page.  

Clients: Badoo, Canva, Clumio, Dropbox, Enel

Pricing: Custom pricing 

G2 Rating: 4.7/5 (455 reviews)

5. MettlFounded in: July 2009    

Founded by: Tonmoy Shingal    

Free Trial: No  

Pros: 

• Each test is divided into many modules, allowing applicants to select the modules they wish to take and the ones they do not or to combine different modules into one.   
• Mettl makes it easier to understand and finalize profiles by making the competencies understandable through graphs and subjective data,  

Cons:

• Mettl doesn't provide any sort of AVG Score or excel reports for scores (local or global standard).  
• It has complex U.I. leading to wastage of time.  

Clients: Ghent University Global Campus, MakeMyTrip, Workforce, Gulf University, NASSCOM    

Pricing: $249/year  

G2 Rating: 4.4/5 (499 reviews)  

Founded in: 2014

Founded by: Tigran Sloyan, Aram Shatakhtsyan, and Felix Desroches

Free Trial: Yes

Pros:

• CodeSignal is ideal for practicing algorithm challenges as it has many daily problems categorized by categories. A different degree of badges is awarded for each challenge.
• The platform has straightforward U.I., so the user does not have to waste much time figuring out the features.
• You can access more than 70 languages, frameworks, and libraries through CodeSignal.

Cons:

• All front-end and back-end skills cannot be tested.
• A restricted number of sessions are provided each month.

Clients: Uber, Robinhood, Meta, Instacart, Zoom, Quora

Pricing: custom pricing

G2 Rating: 4.7/5 (689 reviews)

Founded in: 2012

Founded by: Sachin Gupta

Free Trial: Yes

Pros:

• The platform collaborates with multiple well-known organizations to host Hackathons so that the candidate can stay updated and competitive.  
• To assist candidates in career development, HackerEarth offers helpful tools, including leaderboards, forum discussions, and score analyses.  

Cons: 

• They don’t offer assessments on varying difficulty.  
• Due to indexing and prioritization flaws, navigating the kinds of problems you are attempting to solve is challenging.  
• Because the interview pipeline is unclear, it becomes uncertain to determine how far along the candidate was during the interviewing process. Additionally, human recruiter feedback can be delayed and occasionally end up in spam.  

Clients: Dunnhumby, Walmart, Intuit, Wells Fargo, Amazon

Pricing: $20/month

G2 Rating: 4.5/5 (309 reviews)

Founded in: 2019

Founded by: Wouter Durville and Otto Verhage

Free Trial: Yes

Pros:

• You can effortlessly follow a candidate's interview funnel with TestGorilla.
• Numerous useful skills are offered by TestGorilla, including mental aptitude, culture fit, and other fundamental abilities.
• TestGorilla balances assessment difficulty and, hence, finalizes only job-fit candidates.

Cons: 

• TestGorilla's virtual customer support is unresponsive.
• Video proctoring analysis is not available in TestGorilla.

Clients: Majorel, H&M, Public Groupe, Oracle, Bain & Company

Pricing: Pay-as-you-go model

G2 Rating: 4.5/5 (1023 reviews)

Founded in: 2013

Founded by: Vincent Woo  

Free Trial: Yes  

Pros:      

• Coderpad has an intuitive U.I.
• More than 30 programming languages and 60+ technologies and frameworks are supported by CoderPad.
• It also provides take-home assignments with an optional automatic scoring system for candidates farther down your funnel.

Cons:

• The two essential aspects of Coderpad that are lacking are keybinding and autocomplete for coding assessments.
• CoderPad does not provide take-home coding assessments.
• Since Coderpad doesn't support freehand drawings or pictures, it can be challenging to demonstrate specific concepts and issues.

Clients: Netflix, Shopify, Databricks, Slack, One Medical    

Pricing: $50/month  

G2 Rating: 4.4/5 (209 reviews)

Founded in: 2013

Founded by: Jakub Kubrynski

Free Trial: Yes

Pros:

• DevSkiller is a very adaptable online technical skills assessment tool. You can either customize your assessments or choose from the ready 4000 assessments.
• It aids the recruiter in making impartial recruiting decisions to create a diverse workforce.
• You can quickly identify a candidate's skill gaps with TalentBoost.

Cons:

• The candidates cannot manage their subscriptions and add-ons on Devskiller because the management panel is unavailable.
• DevSkiller is an expensive technical skills assessment tool.
• DevSkiller lacks integration with code-hosting platforms like GitHub, which makes it hard to deploy any changes in tests.

Clients: Jonah Group, IKEA Retail, TPAY, Mindera, ADA

Pricing: $499-$999/month

G2 Rating: 4.7/5 (60 reviews)

Founded in: 2015

Founded by: Abhishek Kaushik

Free Trial: Yes

Pros

• WeCP has a pre-built and customizable library with 2000+ tests for developer skills.
• It has a timely reporting system and an automatic follow-up process.
• The customer service of this technical skills assessment tool is of great help.

Cons:

• The quality of the personalized questions is mediocre.
• The complex U.I. of this assessment tool is not understandable to all.
• The automated grading function is ineffective.

Clients: Infosys, Texas Instruments, Adobe, Bosch, Great Learning

G2 Rating: 4.8/5 (83 reviews)

Pricing: Not available publicly.

Founded in: 2012     

Founded by: Daniel Borowski     

Free Trial: Yes  

Pros:    

• CoderByte invitations allow you to send a public link and a private invitation to a colleague or friend.
• Only after a thorough study is all assessments reversed, assisting candidates in improving their performance each time.
• CoderByte provides multiple-choice questions, challenges, and open-ended inquiries in more than 30 languages and skill levels.

Cons:

• The problems cannot be filtered in any manner using this online coding interview tool, including success rate, complexity, time, candidate count, etc. This deficiency causes the failure of candidates from various backgrounds.
• There aren't many difficulties in programming at the moment.
• CoderByte does not allow customizing tests.

Clients: Cisco, Samsung, Mastercard, Morning Brew, Typeform, Gigster

Pricing: $199/month

G2 Rating: 4.5/5 (327 reviews)

13. HirePro

Founded in: 2003

Founded by: Anshuman Das and Rishi Das

Free Trial: Yes

Pros:

• At HirePro you can continue using your current ATS by integrating it with the software.
• It allows you to customize your approval procedure to meet your company's demands.

Cons:

• The price of this technical assessment platform is higher than others in the market.

Clients: DE Shaw & Co, ALSTOM, ANZ, Allstate, Medtronic

Pricing: On Request

G2 Rating: 4.3/5 (2 reviews)

Founded in: 2017  

Founded by: Wes Winham Winler  

Free Trial: Yes  

Pros:

• Woven offers you mock evaluations and detailed feedback to keep the candidate’s learning process up to date.  
• It provides insightful and thorough real-person evaluations for each assessment.
• Woven's layout is simple, intuitive, and adaptable and includes all the necessary information, including functional code, test code, problem descriptions, and output console.  

Cons:

• Throughout the tests, there is no built-in timer.  
• The solution pages are more complicated than the problems.  

Clients: Bestow, Olive, Greenlight Guru, 15five.

Pricing: $11500/feature

G2 Rating: 4.7/5 (522 reviews)

Founded in: 2019  

Founded by: Tracy Phillips  

Free Trial: Yes  

Pros:  

• A large library of instantly usable, customizable questions is provided in CodeSubmit.  
• This hiring tool offers code pair sessions, take-home tests, and screening challenges in one interface.  
• It enables the applicant to create a unique grading scale for every work that all hiring supervisors can use.  

Cons:

• This technical skills assessment tool lacks ATS integration (Applicant Tracking System).
• Customizable email templates are not available in CodeSubmit.  

Clients: Klari, Konux

Pricing: $79/month (per user)

G2 Rating: 4.9/5 (11 reviews)

FAQs

A technical assessment tool identifies and evaluates the technical abilities of programmers, such as product knowledge, technical maturity, and programming status. The best technical assessment tool available in the market, like iMocha, enables the recruiter to quantify technical skills and make a data-driven hiring decision.

How do you evaluate technical skills?

Here are some simple steps to evaluate technical skills:

• Test the technical skill sets of the candidate.
• Focus more on job-specific skills.
• Tailor each technical assessment.
• Offer testing materials to the applicants.
• Pair the assessment with aptitude tests to ensure culture fitment. 
• Invest in the best technical assessment platform, such as iMocha.  

Online Technical assessments are the means to evaluate a perspective's programming and other technical skills remotely. These tests assess a candidate’s functional, technical, and aptitude dexterity to ensure skill-fit candidates get hired. They also help you create a skills benchmark in your organization that you can use for future candidates as well. 

How long are technical assessments?

The duration of these assessments is dependent on various factors like the difficulty of the test, the role requirements, the components of the test, and more. However, in general, it is a good practice to keep your assessments within 1 – 2 hours so candidates are engaged throughout the process. Some project-based assessments, though, may take up to a day or more, but these are take-home assessments that candidates can take per their discretion.

How can cheating be prevented in online technical assessments?

Cheating can be prevented by

• I.D. Verification to ensure the candidate taking the assessment is the intended one
• Prepare higher-order thinking questions
• Add a time limit to the questions
• Disable Copy-Paste Option
• Enable audio, video, and image proctoring
• Set Window lock with test termination